Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 1, 2023

Shepherd v. Keyser

Judge
Kenneth Karas
Docket
7:21-cv-02363
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil RightsSection 1983Pro SeCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Shepherd v. Keyser, Judge Karas ordered New York’s Attorney General to provide service addresses for the defendants in Shepherd’s civil-rights case.

Who this affects

Eon Shepherd, the named defendants, the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, and the New York State Attorney General’s Office.

What happened

In Shepherd v. Keyser, Eon Shepherd, who is incarcerated at Green Haven Correctional Facility, sued employees of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision. He is representing himself and claims that the defendants violated his constitutional rights while he was incarcerated at Sullivan Correctional Facility.

The court noted that summonses had been issued for all defendants but directed the Attorney General of the State of New York to provide Shepherd and the court with addresses where the defendants could be served. The Attorney General must provide that information within 14 days of the order. The Clerk of Court was also directed to mail the order and complaint to the Attorney General and a copy of the order to Shepherd.

Judge Kenneth M. Karas issued this procedural order under a precedent allowing courts to help self-represented litigants identify or serve defendants. The order did not decide whether Shepherd’s constitutional claims were valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Shepherd v. Keyser · No. 7:21-cv-02363
Judge
Kenneth Karas
Date
Nov. 1, 2023

Background

Eon Shepherd, who is currently incarcerated at Green Haven Correctional Facility, brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal law allowing claims against state officials for constitutional violations. Shepherd is representing himself. He alleges that Superintendent W. Keyser, Captain Maxwell, OSI S. Keyser, Director of SHU Venettozi, Deputy Superintendent J. Krom, DSS Sipple, Sgt. Terwillinger, FHSD Wolff, N.A. Hinton, and C.O. Rosenberg violated his constitutional rights while he was incarcerated at Sullivan Correctional Facility.

The court had previously directed the Clerk of Court to issue summonses for all defendants, and the summonses were issued the next day.

Court’s Action

The court cited a prior decision stating that a self-represented litigant is entitled to the district court’s assistance in identifying an unidentified defendant. Because the defendants were alleged to be employees of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, the court directed the Attorney General of the State of New York, identified as the attorney for and agent of that department, to provide addresses where the defendants could be served.

The Attorney General was ordered to provide the information to Shepherd and the court within 14 days of the order. If any defendants were former department employees or officials, the Attorney General was ordered to provide residential addresses where they could be served. The Clerk of Court was directed to mail the order and complaint to the Attorney General at 28 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10005, and to mail a copy of the order to Shepherd.

Disposition and Significance

Judge Kenneth M. Karas entered a procedural order concerning service of process. The opinion did not resolve the merits of Shepherd’s constitutional claims or determine whether any defendant violated his rights.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.