Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 2, 2023

District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades v…

Full caption

District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.- C.I.O. v. City Newark Glass Co.

Judge
Gregory Woods
Docket
1:23-cv-09537
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
ArbitrationCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades v. City Newark Glass Co., Judge Woods set deadlines for an arbitration-confirmation petition.

Who this affects

The petitioner, District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.- C.I.O., and the respondent, City Newark Glass Co., are affected by the filing, service, and briefing deadlines.

What happened

District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.- C.I.O. filed a petition asking the court to confirm an arbitration award. The petition was filed on October 31, 2023.

The court ordered the petitioner to file and serve a statement required by a local rule and any additional supporting materials by November 22, 2023. The respondent's opposition was due January 2, 2024, and the petitioner's reply, if any, was due January 16, 2024. The petitioner also had to serve the petition and supporting materials by November 9 and file proof of service by November 14.

Judge Gregory Woods did not decide whether to confirm the arbitration award in this order. He set the filing and service requirements and deadlines for the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades v… · No. 1:23-cv-09537
Judge
Gregory Woods
Date
Nov. 2, 2023

Background

On October 31, 2023, the petitioner filed a petition to confirm an arbitration award. The opinion states that proceedings to confirm an arbitration award are treated like a motion for summary judgment, meaning the court generally considers the parties' supporting materials and legal arguments under a procedure used to decide whether a case requires a trial.

Order

The court ordered the petitioner to file and serve a statement under Local Civil Rule 56.1 and any additional materials supporting the petition by November 22, 2023. Those materials could include affidavits or declarations confirming that the petition's exhibits are true and correct copies of what they claim to be.

The respondent's opposition was due January 2, 2024. The petitioner's reply, if any, was due January 16, 2024. The petitioner also had to serve the petition and supporting materials on the respondent by November 9, 2023, and file an affidavit proving service by November 14, 2023.

Disposition

The order sets briefing and service requirements. It does not state whether the arbitration award will be confirmed or otherwise decide the petition's merits. Judge Gregory H. Woods signed the order on November 2, 2023.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.