Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 10, 2023

Highmore Financing Co. I, LLC v. Euler Hermes North America Insurance Company

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:23-cv-09418
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureInsurance
In one sentence

In Highmore Financing v. Euler Hermes, Judge Schofield remanded the case because the notice failed to establish the plaintiff LLC’s members’ citizenship.

Who this affects

Highmore Financing Co. I, LLC and Euler Hermes North America Insurance Company; the action will proceed in New York state court rather than federal court.

What happened

Highmore Financing Co. I, LLC v. Euler Hermes North America Insurance Company concerns Defendant’s removal of the action from New York state court based on diversity jurisdiction.

Federal diversity jurisdiction generally requires the parties to be citizens of different states, and an LLC has the citizenship of each of its members. The court found that Defendant’s removal notice did not provide enough facts to establish the citizenship of every member of Plaintiff LLC.

Judge Schofield ordered that the matter be remanded to state court. She also directed the Clerk of Court to close the federal case and send a certified copy of the Order to the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Highmore Financing Co. I, LLC v. Euler Hermes North America Insurance Company · No. 1:23-cv-09418
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
Nov. 10, 2023

Background

Defendant Euler Hermes North America Insurance Company, doing business as Allianz Trade, filed a notice of removal on October 26, 2023. It removed the action from state court based on diversity jurisdiction, which allows federal courts to hear certain civil cases involving citizens of different states when the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, excluding interest and costs.

Jurisdictional Requirements

The court explained that diversity jurisdiction requires complete diversity, meaning that all opposing parties must be citizens of different states. The party invoking federal jurisdiction bears the burden of establishing that jurisdiction exists. For diversity purposes, a limited liability company generally has the citizenship of each of its members. A removal notice does not establish complete diversity when it fails to allege the citizenship of every member of a party LLC.

Ruling

The court found that Defendant’s notice of removal was procedurally defective because it did not plead facts sufficient to establish the citizenship of each member of Plaintiff Highmore Financing Co. I, LLC. The court ordered that the matter be remanded to state court. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the federal case and mail a certified copy of the Order to the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c).

Classification

This is a procedural order because the court remanded the case for an insufficient jurisdictional showing without deciding the underlying dispute.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.