Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 14, 2023

Iniguez v. Diaz Iron Works

Judge
Philip Halpern
Docket
7:23-cv-05719
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

Iniguez v. Diaz Iron Works: Judge Halpern dismissed pending motions as moot after settlement in principle and ordered a fairness submission.

Who this affects

The parties to the case, any pending motions, and the scheduled conferences were affected. The order also required the parties to submit materials supporting court review of their proposed settlement.

What happened

In Iniguez v. Diaz Iron Works, the parties told the court that they had reached a settlement in principle.

The court dismissed any pending motions as moot and canceled all conferences. It did not decide the underlying claims in this order.

Judge Halpern directed the parties to submit the settlement agreement, a joint explanation addressing fairness and attorney fees, and a proposed order by December 4, 2023, at 5:00 p.m.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Iniguez v. Diaz Iron Works · No. 7:23-cv-05719
Judge
Philip Halpern
Date
Nov. 14, 2023

Background The court was informed that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.

Court’s action The court dismissed any pending motions as moot, meaning that it treated them as no longer requiring decisions because of the reported settlement. It also canceled all conferences.

Under the Second Circuit’s decision in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., the court directed the parties to prepare a joint submission explaining the basis for the proposed settlement, including any provision for attorney fees, and why the settlement should be approved as fair and reasonable. The submission had to include the settlement agreement, joint statement, and proposed order, and was due December 4, 2023, at 5:00 p.m.

Disposition Judge Philip M. Halpern dismissed any pending motions as moot and ordered the parties to file the required settlement materials. This order did not resolve the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.