Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 27, 2023

Toro v. Mint Prints, Inc.

Judge
Andrew Carter
Docket
1:23-cv-02894
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Toro v. Mint Prints, Judge Carter dismissed the case without prejudice after Toro failed to respond to an order requiring a showing.

Who this affects

The dismissal affected Andrew Toro’s action against Mint Prints, Inc., including the claims he brought on behalf of others described as similarly situated. The case was dismissed without prejudice.

What happened

In Toro v. Mint Prints, Inc., Andrew Toro brought an action on behalf of himself and others described as similarly situated. The opinion does not describe the claims.

The court ordered Toro to explain by October 27, 2023 why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, meaning failure to move the case forward. The opinion says Toro did not make that showing.

Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. dismissed the case without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. This means the dismissal did not bar refiling based on the order’s stated terms.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Toro v. Mint Prints, Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-02894
Judge
Andrew Carter
Date
Nov. 27, 2023

Background

Andrew Toro brought this action on behalf of himself and others described as similarly situated against Mint Prints, Inc. The opinion does not state the legal claims or provide additional facts about the dispute.

Order to Show Cause

On October 13, 2023, the court ordered Toro to show cause—that is, explain—by October 27, 2023 why the action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The opinion states that Toro did not make the required showing.

Ruling

The court dismissed the case without prejudice for failure to prosecute under Rule 41(b). The order cites authority stating that a district court may dismiss a plaintiff’s case on its own for failure to prosecute. Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. signed the order on November 27, 2023.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.