Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 30, 2023

Larkin v. SailawayNY

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:22-cv-10737
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Fee PetitionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Larkin v. SailawayNY, Judge Schofield approved the settlement, awarded counsel fees and expenses, and directed the case closed.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs, their counsel, and the defendants who were parties to the proposed settlement.

What happened

In Larkin v. SailawayNY, the court approved the parties’ proposed settlement as fair and reasonable, considering the nature and scope of the plaintiffs’ claims and the risks and expenses of further litigation.

The total recovery was $37,500. Plaintiffs’ counsel was to receive $12,500 in attorney’s fees and $615.50 in expenses, with the remaining amount distributed to the plaintiffs.

Judge Lorna G. Schofield directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Larkin v. SailawayNY · No. 1:22-cv-10737
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
Nov. 30, 2023

Background

The plaintiffs moved for attorney’s fees and costs as part of the parties’ proposed settlement. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims.

Ruling

The court approved the settlement as fair and reasonable. It cited the nature and scope of the plaintiffs’ claims, along with the risks and expenses involved in additional litigation.

Of the $37,500 total recovery, the plaintiffs’ counsel was to receive $12,500 in attorney’s fees and $615.50 in expenses. The remaining settlement amount was to be distributed to the plaintiffs. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case.

Effect

The order approved the proposed settlement and specified the allocation of the recovery between plaintiffs’ counsel and the plaintiffs. It did not describe the underlying claims or make findings about their merits.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.