Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled Dec. 1, 2023

Murillo v. Commissioner of Social Security

Judge
Robert Lehrburger
Docket
1:23-cv-03691
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Social SecurityCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Murillo v. Commissioner of Social Security, Judge Lehrburger reversed the decision and remanded the case for further administrative proceedings.

Who this affects

Alexander Telixmurillo and the Commissioner of Social Security; the case returns to the Social Security Administration for further administrative proceedings.

What happened

Murillo v. Commissioner of Social Security concerned Alexander Telixmurillo’s case against the Commissioner of Social Security.

The judgment states that the court acted for the reasons given in a stipulation and order dated December 1, 2023. The opinion text does not describe those reasons.

The court reversed the Commissioner’s decision and remanded the case for further administrative proceedings under the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Judge Robert Lehrburger is identified as the judge.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Murillo v. Commissioner of Social Security · No. 1:23-cv-03691
Judge
Robert Lehrburger
Date
Dec. 1, 2023

Background

Alexander Telixmurillo brought this Social Security case against the Commissioner of Social Security. The judgment refers to a stipulation and order dated December 1, 2023, but the provided opinion text does not explain the underlying dispute or the reasons for the court’s decision.

Ruling

The court reversed the Commissioner’s decision and remanded the action to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings under the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). A remand sends the matter back to the agency for additional proceedings. The judgment cites Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993).

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.