Deloatch v. Commissioner of Social Security
- Stewart Aaron
- 1:23-cv-08065
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Deloatch v. Commissioner, Judge Aaron reversed the Commissioner’s decision and remanded the Social Security case for further proceedings and a new decision.
Rebeccaa Deloatch and the Commissioner of Social Security; the case returns to the Commissioner for further proceedings, a possible new hearing, and a new decision.
What happened
Deloatch v. Commissioner of Social Security concerned a challenge to the Commissioner’s decision in a Social Security case. The judgment gives no further details about the underlying dispute.
The court said the reasons were stated in a December 22, 2023 Stipulation and Order. It reversed the Commissioner’s decision and sent the case back for further administrative proceedings, including an opportunity for Deloatch to have a new hearing.
Judge Stewart Aaron’s court entered judgment remanding the case under the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings and a new decision.
The detailed version
- Deloatch v. Commissioner of Social Security · No. 1:23-cv-08065
- Stewart Aaron
- Dec. 22, 2023
What the Judgment Decided
In Deloatch v. Commissioner of Social Security, the court reversed the Commissioner’s decision and remanded, or sent back, the action to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings and a new decision. The remand was made under the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the provision authorizing a federal court to enter a judgment reversing the Commissioner’s decision and remanding a Social Security case.
What Happens on Remand
The judgment states that Deloatch will be offered the opportunity for a new hearing. It does not describe the underlying claims, the Commissioner’s decision, or the specific reasons for reversal; instead, it refers to the reasons stated in the court’s Stipulation and Order dated December 22, 2023.
Disposition
Judge Stewart Aaron’s court entered judgment reversing the Commissioner’s decision and remanding the action for further administrative proceedings and a new decision.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.