In Re: 45 John Lofts, LLC
- Vyskocil
- 1:23-cv-05357
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In Re: 45 John Lofts, Judge Vyskocil granted the defendants’ motion to stay enforcement of bankruptcy-related orders while appeals proceed.
The stay pauses enforcement against Chaim Babad and Congregation Kahal Minchas Church while their appeals proceed, while the $3 million bond protects 45 John Lofts, LLC if it ultimately prevails on appeal.
What happened
In Re: 45 John Lofts, LLC concerns the defendants’ request to pause enforcement of a Bankruptcy Court turnover order, a judgment, and a related decision while they appeal. The defendants had previously been told they could renew their request after providing a $3 million bond.
The defendants filed proof of the $3 million appeal bond. The plaintiff opposed the renewed request, but the court concluded that the bond reasonably protected the plaintiff because it could satisfy the money judgment if the plaintiff ultimately prevailed on appeal.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil granted the defendants’ motion to stay enforcement pending appeal under the federal civil procedure and bankruptcy rules. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate the motion.
The detailed version
- In Re: 45 John Lofts, LLC · No. 1:23-cv-05357
- Vyskocil
- Jan. 4, 2024
Background
The defendants-appellants, Chaim Babad and Congregation Kahal Minchas Church, asked the court to stay, or pause, enforcement of three bankruptcy-related rulings while their appeals were pending: the Bankruptcy Court’s November 2, 2023 turnover order; a June 2, 2023 judgment and order entered in favor of 45 John Lofts, LLC; and the related April 14, 2023 memorandum of decision.
This was the defendants’ renewed motion. In an earlier ruling, the court denied their November 20, 2023 motion without prejudice and allowed them to renew it after providing proof of a $3 million bond. The defendants later filed proof of a $3 million appeal bond naming both defendants as principals. The plaintiff opposed the renewed motion.
Court’s reasoning
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62(b) allows a party to obtain a stay of execution of a judgment by providing a bond or other security approved by the court. The court explained that a stay takes effect when the court approves the bond or security. The court also exercised discretion under Bankruptcy Rule 8007, which governs stays pending an appeal in a bankruptcy matter.
The court found that the plaintiff would not be prejudiced or harmed by the stay because the $3 million bond reasonably protected the plaintiff. If the plaintiff ultimately prevailed on appeal, the bond would be available to satisfy the money judgment owed to the plaintiff.
Disposition
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil GRANTED the defendants-appellants’ motion to stay pending appeal under Rule 62(b) and Bankruptcy Rule 8007. The Clerk of Court was respectfully requested to terminate the motion listed at docket entry 29. The opinion does not state the outcome of the underlying appeals.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.