BEAUMONT v. VANGUARD LOGISTICS SERVICES, INC.
- Vyskocil
- 1:22-cv-06235
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Beaumont v. Vanguard Logistics Services (USA), Inc., Judge Vyskocil dismissed the settled action, allowing restoration by February 5, 2024.
The parties to the action were affected: the case was discontinued following their settlement, with restoration available by February 5, 2024, and dismissal with prejudice if no restoration request was made by that date.
What happened
Beaumont v. Vanguard Logistics Services (USA), Inc. ended after the court was informed that the parties had agreed to settle the matter.
The court discontinued the action without costs to any party and allowed either side to ask to restore it to the court’s calendar by February 5, 2024.
Judge Vyskocil ordered that the dismissal would be with prejudice if no restoration request was filed by that date; all other dates and deadlines were postponed indefinitely.
The detailed version
- BEAUMONT v. VANGUARD LOGISTICS SERVICES, INC. · No. 1:22-cv-06235
- Vyskocil
- Jan. 5, 2024
Background
The court was informed by the Magistrate Judge that the parties had reached an agreement to settle the matter. The opinion does not state the underlying claims or the terms of the settlement.
Order
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar. A request to restore the action had to be made by February 5, 2024. “Without prejudice” meant that restoration remained possible during that period.
If no request to restore the action was made by February 5, 2024, the court ordered that the dismissal would be with prejudice, meaning the action could not be restored through that procedure. The court also postponed all other dates and deadlines indefinitely.
Disposition
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered the order of dismissal on January 5, 2024. The opinion does not describe a decision on the merits of the parties’ underlying dispute.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.