Weinberg v. Fronteo USA, Inc.
- Vyskocil
- 1:23-cv-05967
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Weinberg v. Fronteo USA, Judge Vyskocil dismissed the action after a settlement in principle, allowing restoration by February 12, 2024.
Andrea Weinberg, Fronteo USA, Inc., and Naritomo Ikeue; the case was discontinued based on the parties’ reported settlement in principle, subject to the stated restoration deadline.
What happened
In Weinberg v. Fronteo USA, Inc. and Naritomo Ikeue, Andrea Weinberg told the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
The court discontinued the case without costs to any party and allowed it to be restored if the parties could not put their settlement in writing and requested restoration by February 12, 2024.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that if no restoration request was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Weinberg v. Fronteo USA, Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-05967
- Vyskocil
- Jan. 12, 2024
Background
The court received a letter from Andrea Weinberg stating that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.
Court’s action
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing. Any application to restore the action had to be made by February 12, 2024.
Effect of the deadline
The order states that if no application to restore the action was made by February 12, 2024, the dismissal would be with prejudice, meaning the action could not be restored under that order. The court did not decide the underlying claims.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.