Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 19, 2024

Birkett v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:23-cv-09214
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Birkett v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union, Judge Broderick ordered Birkett to explain the delayed service and warned Pentagon could be dismissed.

Who this affects

Tyrone Birkett and Pentagon Federal Credit Union were primarily affected. Birkett was required to explain the failure to serve Pentagon, and Pentagon faced possible dismissal if he did not do so. Equifax Information Services, LLC had waived service.

What happened

In Birkett v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union, Tyrone Birkett sued Pentagon Federal Credit Union and Equifax Information Services, LLC. Birkett obtained summonses for both defendants, but Equifax waived service and Birkett had not filed proof that Pentagon was served.

The court ordered Birkett to submit a letter of no more than three pages by January 25, 2024, explaining why Pentagon should not be dismissed under the federal service deadline. The letter had to include legal support and show good cause for the failure to serve Pentagon within 90 days after filing the complaint.

Judge Vernon S. Broderick warned that Pentagon would be dismissed if Birkett did not submit the letter and demonstrate good cause. The order did not dismiss Pentagon at that time.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Birkett v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union · No. 1:23-cv-09214
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
Jan. 19, 2024

Background

Tyrone Birkett brought this action against Pentagon Federal Credit Union ("Pentagon") and Equifax Information Services, LLC ("Equifax"). Birkett obtained a summons for Pentagon on October 20, 2023, and a summons for Equifax on October 24, 2023. Equifax waived service, but Birkett had not filed an affidavit of service for Pentagon.

Order

The court ordered Birkett to submit, no later than January 25, 2024, a letter of no more than three pages supported by legal authority. The letter had to demonstrate good cause—meaning a legally sufficient reason—for why Pentagon should not be dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), which addresses the deadline for serving a defendant with the summons and complaint.

The court explained that good cause generally exists only in exceptional circumstances in which the failure to serve on time resulted from circumstances beyond the plaintiff's control. It also noted that courts consider the plaintiff's diligence in attempting service and any prejudice caused to the defendant by the delay. The opinion states that attorney inadvertence, neglect, mistake, or misplaced reliance does not establish good cause, although the quoted sentence is incomplete in the provided text.

Disposition

Judge Vernon S. Broderick did not dismiss Pentagon in this order. Instead, he warned that failure to submit the required letter and demonstrate good cause for not serving Pentagon within 90 days after the complaint was filed would result in Pentagon's dismissal from the action. Equifax's service was not at issue because Equifax had waived service.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.