Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 19, 2024

Brown v. Deckers Outdoor Corporation

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:23-cv-03596
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Brown v. Deckers, Judge Abrams discontinued the settled-in-principle action without costs, allowing restoration within 30 days.

Who this affects

Lamar Brown, the other similarly situated persons he represented, and Deckers Outdoor Corp.; the action was closed subject to a possible timely request for restoration.

What happened

Brown v. Deckers Outdoor Corp. was a case brought by Lamar Brown on behalf of himself and others similarly situated. The court was told that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.

The court discontinued the action without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s docket within 30 days. The court directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.

Judge Ronnie Abrams also required any request to reopen the case to be filed within 30 days. The parties could ask the court to retain authority to enforce a settlement only if they placed the settlement terms on the public record and obtained the court’s approval within that period.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Brown v. Deckers Outdoor Corporation · No. 1:23-cv-03596
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
Jan. 19, 2024

Background

The court stated that it had been informed that the action had been settled in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement terms. Lamar Brown brought the action on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated.

Disposition

The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s docket if an application to restore it was made within 30 days. The court stated that any application to reopen the action had to be filed within 30 days of the order and that an application filed later could be denied solely because it was late.

The court further stated that, if the parties wanted the court to retain authority to enforce a settlement agreement, the agreement’s terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 30-day period. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.