Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 22, 2024

Bevel v. Mennella's Poultry Co., Inc.

Judge
Sarah Cave
Docket
1:23-cv-05678
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Bevel v. Mennella’s Poultry, Judge Cave ordered the parties to jointly submit materials about whether the settlement is fair and reasonable.

Who this affects

Royce Bevel and Mennella’s Poultry Co., Inc., whose parties must jointly submit the required settlement materials.

What happened

In Bevel v. Mennella’s Poultry Co., Inc., the court said the case includes one or more claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act and requires review of the parties’ settlement.

The parties must jointly file a letter-motion by February 12, 2024. It must discuss the claims and defenses, the defendant’s possible financial exposure, the strengths and weaknesses of the case, the settlement amount, the negotiation process, and other facts relevant to whether the settlement is reasonable. They must also provide information about attorney fees and attach the settlement agreement.

Judge Sarah L. Cave ordered the parties to submit these materials. The order did not decide whether the settlement is fair, approve the settlement, or resolve the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Bevel v. Mennella's Poultry Co., Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-05678
Judge
Sarah Cave
Date
Jan. 22, 2024

Background

The case includes one or more claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The opinion does not identify the specific claims, defenses, settlement amount, or terms of the settlement.

Court’s Order

Citing the requirements of Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., the court required the parties to file a joint letter-motion addressing whether their settlement is fair and reasonable. The parties must file it by February 12, 2024.

The letter-motion must address the claims and defenses; the defendant’s potential monetary exposure and the basis for calculating it; the strengths and weaknesses of the plaintiff’s case and the defendant’s defenses; any reasons for a difference between the potential value of the claims and the settlement amount; the litigation and negotiation process; and other relevant issues, including whether a judgment would be collectible if the case proceeded to trial.

The parties must also explain their attorney-fee arrangement, attach any retainer agreement, provide information about actual attorney fees and costs—including billing records and cost documentation—and attach the settlement agreement itself.

Disposition and Effect

Judge Sarah L. Cave ordered the parties to submit the joint letter-motion and supporting materials. The opinion does not approve or reject the settlement and does not resolve the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.