Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 22, 2024

Lee v. City University N.Y.

Judge
Katherine Failla
Docket
1:24-cv-00094
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Lee v. City University N.Y., Judge Failla transferred Lee’s case to the Eastern District of New York because Brooklyn was the more convenient venue.

Who this affects

Brenda Lee’s case was moved from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of New York. The order also affected CUNY and the individual defendants by changing the court handling the action; it did not decide the merits of Lee’s allegations.

What happened

In Lee v. City University of New York, Brenda Lee, representing herself, sued the university and several individuals over alleged constitutional-rights violations arising from events at Kingsborough Community College in Brooklyn.

The Southern District of New York concluded that the Eastern District of New York was also a proper venue because the events occurred at the Brooklyn campus. The court determined that Brooklyn was more convenient for the parties, witnesses, and evidence.

Judge Katherine Failla ordered the case transferred to the Eastern District of New York. She directed that no summons issue from her court and closed the case in the Southern District of New York.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Lee v. City University N.Y. · No. 1:24-cv-00094
Judge
Katherine Failla
Date
Jan. 22, 2024

Background

Brenda Lee brought this action without a lawyer against the City University of New York and several individual defendants identified in the complaint as Mr. Toback, Professor Buttaro, a biology professor, Dr. and Professor Hessi, Dean of Students Michael Poindexter, and Rebecca Carado. Lee alleged that her constitutional rights were violated during events at Kingsborough Community College in Brooklyn. The court had previously allowed Lee to proceed without prepaying filing fees.

Venue Analysis

The court considered whether the Southern District of New York was a proper place for the case and whether another district would be more convenient. Under the federal venue statute, a civil action may generally be filed where a defendant resides, where a substantial part of the events occurred, or, in limited circumstances, where a defendant is subject to the court’s authority.

The court noted that Lee had not provided the individual defendants’ specific residences. It also noted that the complaint alleged that the events occurred at Kingsborough, which is in Brooklyn and therefore in the Eastern District of New York. The court stated that CUNY was arguably a resident of both districts because its campuses are located throughout the New York City metropolitan area. Even assuming venue was proper in the Southern District, the court concluded that venue was also proper in the Eastern District because the substantial events occurred there.

The court then applied the federal transfer statute, which allows a court to transfer a case to another proper district for the convenience of the parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice. It emphasized that the underlying events occurred in Brooklyn, where Lee resides and where the individual defendants appeared to work. The court also considered it reasonable to expect that relevant documents and witnesses would be in Brooklyn. Because Lee did not reside in the Southern District and the operative events did not occur there, the court gave her choice of forum less weight.

Disposition

The court transferred the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Judge Katherine Polk Failla directed the Clerk of Court to make the transfer, ordered that a summons not issue from the Southern District, and closed the case in that court. The order addressed venue and convenience; it did not decide whether Lee’s constitutional-rights allegations were valid.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.