Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 23, 2024

Shukla v. Meta Platforms Inc.

Judge
Clarke
Docket
1:23-cv-10150
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Shukla v. Meta, Judge Clarke adopted the recommendation denying Shukla’s motion to return the case to state court.

Who this affects

Ashu Shukla’s request to return the action to state court was denied; the case remained in federal court, and the court stated that Shukla waived the right to object to the recommendation and to obtain appellate review of it.

What happened

In Shukla v. Meta Platforms Inc., Ashu Shukla asked the federal court to send the case back to state court. A magistrate judge recommended denying that request.

The parties were given 14 days to object to the recommendation, but no objections or extension request was filed. The court therefore found that Shukla waived the right to object and to seek appellate review of the recommendation.

Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke adopted the recommendation in full and denied the motion to remand. The clerk was directed to terminate the motion listed as ECF No. 8.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Shukla v. Meta Platforms Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-10150
Judge
Clarke
Date
Jan. 23, 2024

Background

Ashu Shukla sued Meta Platforms Inc. and Deloitte Consulting LLP. Shukla filed a motion asking the federal court to remand, or return, the action to state court. The case had been referred to Magistrate Judge Stein for general trial purposes and dispositive motions.

Report and Recommendation

Magistrate Judge Stein issued a Report and Recommendation on January 1, 2024, recommending that Shukla’s motion to remand be denied. The parties were told they had 14 days after service to file objections and were warned that failing to object on time would waive the right to object.

Court’s Review and Ruling

No objections or request for an extension had been filed by the date of the order. The court concluded that Shukla had waived the right to object to the Report and Recommendation and to obtain appellate review of it. Even so, the court reviewed the recommendation and found it well reasoned and supported by the facts and law.

Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke adopted the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. The court therefore denied the motion to remand, and the clerk was directed to terminate ECF No. 8.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.