Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 25, 2024

Ron Meyer v. Susan Seidel

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:20-cv-03536
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Ron Meyer v. Susan Seidel, Judge Broderick ordered the parties to jointly propose next steps after a Second Circuit decision.

Who this affects

Ron Meyer, Susan Seidel, and the other parties to the case were required to submit a joint letter proposing next steps.

What happened

In Ron Meyer v. Susan Seidel, the district court acted after the Second Circuit issued a decision in a related appeal.

The court ordered the parties to file a joint letter proposing what should happen next in the case. If they disagreed, they had to describe their separate positions on each disputed issue. The letter was due by February 9, 2024.

Judge Broderick did not decide the underlying dispute in this order; he directed the parties to submit the required letter.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ron Meyer v. Susan Seidel · No. 1:20-cv-03536
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
Jan. 25, 2024

Background

The order states that the action was proceeding in light of a Second Circuit decision identified as Meyer v. Seidel, 89 F.4th 117 (2d Cir. 2023). The opinion does not explain the underlying claims or what the appellate decision decided.

Order

The court ordered the parties to submit a joint letter proposing the next steps in the case. If the parties disagreed about any issue, the letter had to present each side’s position in a separately labeled section. The filing deadline was February 9, 2024.

Disposition

Judge Vernon S. Broderick entered a case-management order directing the parties to file the joint letter. The order did not resolve the underlying dispute or state a final ruling on the parties’ claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.