Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 26, 2024

Monterey Bay Military Housing, LLC v. Ambac Assurance Corporation

Judge
Paul Gardephe
Docket
1:19-cv-09193
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureSummary Judgment
In one sentence

In Monterey Bay Military Housing v. Ambac Assurance, Judge Gardephe set summary-judgment deadlines and denied the parties’ motions to seal.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs and defendants, whose summary-judgment briefing was scheduled and whose motions to seal were denied; the public, because the court applied the presumption of access to judicial documents.

What happened

Monterey Bay Military Housing, LLC v. Ambac Assurance Corporation involved proposed summary-judgment motions, a proposed cross-motion about the defendants’ unclean-hands defense, and motions to seal records and deposition testimony.

The court set deadlines for the summary-judgment briefing: February 23, 2024, for moving papers; March 22, 2024, for opposition papers; and April 5, 2024, for replies. It denied the motions to seal because the parties provided no basis for sealing, while allowing them to file a renewed motion by February 2, 2024, with supporting declarations and legal analysis.

Judge Paul G. Gardephe also directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the motions listed at Docket Numbers 789–99, 805, and 808. The order did not decide the parties’ summary-judgment motions on their merits.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Monterey Bay Military Housing, LLC v. Ambac Assurance Corporation · No. 1:19-cv-09193
Judge
Paul Gardephe
Date
Jan. 26, 2024

What was before the court

The court addressed three groups of matters: pre-motion letters concerning the defendants’ proposed motion for summary judgment; pre-motion letters concerning the plaintiffs’ proposed cross-motion for summary judgment on the defendants’ unclean-hands defense; and the parties’ letter motions to seal records and deposition testimony. The parties submitted unredacted copies of the sealing motions and exhibits under seal.

Briefing schedule

The court set the following schedule for the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment:

- Moving papers were due February 23, 2024. - Opposition papers were due March 22, 2024. - Reply papers, if any, were due April 5, 2024.

Sealing motions

The court denied the parties’ motions to seal because they had provided no basis for sealing. It permitted any renewed sealing motion to be filed by February 2, 2024. The court required a renewed motion to include declarations explaining particularized reasons for sealing and an analysis of applicable case law, including Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga. The court also noted that the parties’ consent or a confidentiality agreement, by itself, generally is not enough to overcome the presumption of public access to judicial documents.

Disposition

The court denied the motions to seal and set the summary-judgment briefing schedule. It directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the motions pending at Docket Numbers 789–99, 805, and 808. This order did not resolve the proposed summary-judgment motions on their merits.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.