Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 29, 2024

Samuel Lopez v. 85 First Ave llc

Judge
Rochon
Docket
1:24-cv-00533
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Samuel Lopez v. 85 First Ave LLC, Judge Rochon ordered settlement talks and a joint status letter.

Who this affects

Samuel Lopez, 85 First Ave LLC, and A&T Fish and Chips LLC.

What happened

In Samuel Lopez v. 85 First Ave LLC, the court ordered the parties to try to settle the case after the summons and complaint are served, or after service is waived.

The parties must meet for at least one hour within 30 days and discuss whether Samuel Lopez has satisfied the requirement of having a proper basis to bring the case. If they cannot settle, they must also discuss mediation or a settlement conference before a magistrate judge.

Within 45 days, the parties must file a joint letter telling Judge Rochon whether they settled. If not, they must ask for mediation or a settlement conference, or request an initial status conference. The order did not decide the merits of the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Samuel Lopez v. 85 First Ave llc · No. 1:24-cv-00533
Judge
Rochon
Date
Jan. 29, 2024

Order

Judge Jennifer L. Rochon ordered Samuel Lopez, 85 First Ave LLC, and A&T Fish and Chips LLC to meet and confer—that is, discuss the case directly—in a good-faith effort to settle it.

Required settlement discussions

The parties must meet for at least one hour within 30 days after service of the summons and complaint, or within 30 days after waiver of service. During those discussions, they should consider whether Lopez has satisfied the threshold requirement of standing, meaning whether he has a sufficient legal basis to bring the action. The order cited Calcano v. Swarovski North America Ltd. and Harty v. West Point Realty, Inc. in connection with that issue.

If the parties cannot settle the case themselves, they must also discuss whether further settlement discussions through the court-annexed mediation program or before a magistrate judge would be productive at that time.

Joint letter and next steps

Within 15 additional days—45 days after service of the summons and complaint, or 45 days after waiver of service—the parties must submit a joint letter stating whether they settled. If they did not settle, the letter must request either referral to mediation or a settlement conference before a magistrate judge, with the parties' preference identified, or an initial status conference.

The order addressed settlement and case-management steps. It did not decide standing or the merits of the claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.