Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 29, 2024

136 Field Point Circle Holding Company, LLC v. Razinski

Judge
Rearden
Docket
1:21-cv-11076
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

136 Field Point Circle v. Razinski: Judge Rearden denied the plaintiff’s default-judgment motion without prejudice because required filing steps were missing.

Who this affects

The ruling affected 136 Field Point Circle Holding Company, LLC’s motion for a default judgment against Invar International Holdings, Inc.; it did not resolve the plaintiff’s entitlement to judgment or damages.

What happened

In 136 Field Point Circle Holding Company, LLC v. Razinski, the plaintiff asked the court to enter a default judgment against Invar International Holdings, Inc. and hold a hearing to determine damages. The motion cited Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

The court said the plaintiff had not first obtained the Clerk’s Certificate of Default required before seeking default judgment. It also explained that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55, not Rule 41, governs entry of default and default judgment.

Judge Jennifer H. Rearden denied the motion without prejudice to renewal and directed the plaintiff to comply with the applicable federal, local, electronic-filing, and individual rules. The clerk was directed to terminate docket entries 59 and 60.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
136 Field Point Circle Holding Company, LLC v. Razinski · No. 1:21-cv-11076
Judge
Rearden
Date
Jan. 29, 2024

Motion

The plaintiff, 136 Field Point Circle Holding Company, LLC, moved for a default judgment against defendant Invar International Holdings, Inc. The plaintiff also requested a hearing to determine damages and other relief. Its notice of motion relied on Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and described the requested judgment as based on failure to prosecute.

Court’s reasoning

The court denied the motion because the plaintiff had not obtained the Clerk’s Certificate of Default required before requesting a default judgment. The court cited the Southern District of New York’s electronic case-filing rules and Local Civil Rule 55.1, which requires a request for a Clerk’s Certificate of Default when seeking entry of default under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a).

The court further stated that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55—not Rule 41, on which the plaintiff relied—governs the entry of default and default judgment. The court instructed that any renewed motion must comply with Rule 55, Local Civil Rule 55.1, Rule 16.1 of the Southern District of New York’s electronic filing rules, and Rule 5.H of the judge’s individual practices.

Disposition

Judge Jennifer H. Rearden denied the motion without prejudice to renewal. The clerk was directed to terminate docket entries 59 and 60. The opinion did not decide whether the plaintiff was entitled to a default judgment or damages.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.