Pure Brazilian USA LLC v. Medrick
- Vernon Broderick
- 1:23-cv-10946
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Pure Brazilian USA LLC v. Medrick, Judge Broderick dismissed the complaint without prejudice, allowed repleading, and denied the injunction motion as moot.
Pure Brazilian USA LLC, Christine Medrick, and Yvette Felix-Tsaboukos. The amended complaint was dismissed because it did not properly plead the citizenship of Pure Brazilian’s members, while Pure Brazilian’s request for emergency injunctive relief was denied as moot.
What happened
Pure Brazilian USA LLC v. Medrick began when Pure Brazilian sued Christine Medrick and later added Yvette Felix-Tsaboukos in an amended complaint. Pure Brazilian based federal jurisdiction on the parties being citizens of different states.
The court found that the amended complaint did not identify the citizenship of each member of Pure Brazilian, a limited liability company. Without that information, the complaint did not properly show that the court had authority to hear the case based on diversity of citizenship.
Judge Broderick dismissed the amended complaint without prejudice and allowed Pure Brazilian 30 days to file another complaint fixing the jurisdictional problem. He also denied Pure Brazilian’s request for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction as moot.
The detailed version
- Pure Brazilian USA LLC v. Medrick · No. 1:23-cv-10946
- Vernon Broderick
- Jan. 30, 2024
Background
Pure Brazilian USA LLC filed the action against Christine Medrick on December 18, 2023. It later filed an amended complaint adding Yvette Felix-Tsaboukos as a defendant. The amended complaint asserted federal jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship, which generally requires the opposing parties to be citizens of different states.
Jurisdictional Defect
The court explained that a limited liability company is treated as a citizen of every state in which any of its members is a citizen. Although Pure Brazilian identified its principal place of business, the amended complaint did not allege the citizenship of each of its constituent members. The court therefore concluded that the pleading did not properly establish diversity jurisdiction.
Because the amended complaint failed to plead subject-matter jurisdiction, the court dismissed it on its own authority under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3). The court did not decide the underlying claims.
Disposition
The court dismissed Pure Brazilian’s amended complaint without prejudice and with leave to replead. Pure Brazilian was given 30 days to file an amended complaint that properly asserts subject-matter jurisdiction. If it did not do so within that period, the Clerk of Court was directed to terminate the action.
The court also denied as moot Pure Brazilian’s motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. The Clerk was directed to terminate the motion pending at Document 14.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.