Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC v. MaxLinear, Inc.
- Alvin Hellerstein
- 1:23-cv-04436
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In Comcast Cable Communications Management v. MaxLinear, Judge Hellerstein's provided filing is a request to keep trade-secret materials sealed, not a final ruling.
MaxLinear and Comcast are affected by the request. The requested sealing would restrict public access to portions of Comcast's motion and an attached exhibit containing information that MaxLinear describes as confidential trade-secret material.
What happened
Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC v. MaxLinear, Inc. concerns MaxLinear's request to keep certain information sealed in Comcast's motion to dismiss MaxLinear's counterclaims and an attached exhibit.
MaxLinear's filing says the materials contain confidential FDX amplifier designs, diagrams, descriptions, testing data, and information shared with Comcast under a nondisclosure agreement. It argues that protecting these trade secrets outweighs the public's presumptive right to access court documents.
The provided text does not show a final ruling on permanent sealing by Judge Hellerstein. It says the court had temporarily sealed the materials on January 29, 2024, while MaxLinear requested that they remain sealed permanently.
The detailed version
- Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC v. MaxLinear, Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-04436
- Alvin Hellerstein
- Jan. 30, 2024
Nature of the Provided Filing
The provided text is a letter from MaxLinear's counsel, not a court opinion or order deciding the request. MaxLinear asks the court to keep permanently under seal specified portions of Comcast's motion to dismiss MaxLinear's counterclaims and Exhibit 8 to a supporting declaration.
Background
The letter states that Comcast filed a request for permission to seal and redact portions of its motion and Exhibit 8. It further states that the court temporarily sealed the redacted materials on January 29, 2024.
MaxLinear identifies the proposed sealed material as a presentation it gave Comcast in December 2020 about FDX amplifier technology, along with limited portions of Comcast's motion that describe or reproduce information from the presentation. According to the letter, the presentation was made under an active nondisclosure agreement and contains confidential technical designs, diagrams, descriptions, and performance-testing information. MaxLinear says the information forms part of the basis for its trade-secret counterclaims and defenses.
Legal Standard Described in the Letter
The letter explains that judicial documents generally carry a presumption of public access, although that presumption is not absolute. It describes a three-step analysis: whether the material is a judicial document, how strong the public-access presumption is, and whether countervailing interests outweigh that presumption. The letter relies on authorities stating that protecting trade secrets and confidential business information can justify sealing court materials.
Requested Relief and Disposition
MaxLinear requests that the court order the identified trade-secret information to remain permanently under seal. The provided text does not include an order granting, denying, or otherwise disposing of that request. It reports only that the materials had been temporarily sealed before the letter was submitted.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.