Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 30, 2024

7Group, LLC v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Company

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:23-cv-06656
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureInsurance
In one sentence

7Group v. Mt. Hawley Insurance, Judge Vyskocil, dismissed the action after settlement, allowing restoration by February 29, 2024, and otherwise making dismissal with prejudice.

Who this affects

7Group, LLC and Mt. Hawley Insurance Company were affected: the case was discontinued, with a deadline to seek restoration and a stated consequence if no application was made.

What happened

In 7Group, LLC v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Company, the parties told the court that they had reached a settlement in principle.

The court discontinued the case without costs to either party. The case could be restored to the court’s calendar if a party applied by February 29, 2024.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that, if no restoration application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
7Group, LLC v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Company · No. 1:23-cv-06656
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Jan. 30, 2024

Background The court received letters from 7Group, LLC and Mt. Hawley Insurance Company stating that they had reached a settlement in principle.

Ruling The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar. An application to restore the action had to be made by February 29, 2024. The order stated that if no such application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

Effect The order ended the case subject to the stated deadline for seeking restoration. The opinion did not decide the underlying dispute between the parties.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.