Tejada v. Target Corporation
- Vyskocil
- 1:23-cv-06450
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Tejada v. Target, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the case after a settlement in principle, allowing restoration by March 29, 2024, before dismissal becomes with prejudice.
Maria Tejada, Target Corporation, and the other defendants in the action.
What happened
In Tejada v. Target Corporation, Target told the court on behalf of all counsel that the parties had reached a settlement in principle with help from a mediator.
The court discontinued the case without requiring any party to pay costs. It allowed the case to be restored to the court’s calendar if an application was made by March 29, 2024.
If no application to restore the case was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice. Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil issued the order on January 30, 2024.
The detailed version
- Tejada v. Target Corporation · No. 1:23-cv-06450
- Vyskocil
- Jan. 30, 2024
Background
The court received a letter from Target Corporation, written on behalf of all counsel, reporting that all parties had reached a settlement in principle with the assistance of a mediator.
Order
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar. The parties had until March 29, 2024, to apply to restore the action. The order states that if no such application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.