Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 31, 2024

Brown v. L'ovedbaby, LLC

Judge
Rearden
Docket
1:22-cv-09068
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Brown v. L’ovedbaby, LLC, Judge Rearden dismissed the case without prejudice for failure to prosecute after no default-judgment motion was filed.

Who this affects

Lamar Brown, the people he sought to represent, and L’ovedbaby, LLC; the case was dismissed without prejudice and closed.

What happened

In Brown v. L’ovedbaby, LLC, Lamar Brown sued L’ovedbaby, LLC on behalf of himself and others he said were similarly situated. The defendant was served but did not respond or otherwise appear.

The court ordered Brown to seek a default judgment or explain why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Brown did neither and took no other action.

Judge Jennifer H. Rearden dismissed the case without prejudice for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and the court’s inherent authority. The clerk was directed to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Brown v. L'ovedbaby, LLC · No. 1:22-cv-09068
Judge
Rearden
Date
Jan. 31, 2024

Background

Lamar Brown filed the complaint on October 24, 2022, against L’ovedbaby, LLC, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated. The defendant was served on December 14, 2022. Its response was due on January 4, 2023, but it did not respond to the complaint or otherwise appear.

Order to Show Cause

On January 19, 2024, the court directed Brown to file a motion for default judgment by January 29, 2024, or show why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The court warned that failing to file a timely and proper motion could result in dismissal without prejudice. Brown did not request a certificate of default, move for default judgment, or take any other action.

Ruling and Effect

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and its inherent authority, the court dismissed the case, without prejudice, for failure to prosecute. The clerk of court was directed to close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.