Suriel v. Commissioner of Social Security
- Sarah Cave
- 1:23-cv-08143
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Suriel v. Commissioner of Social Security, Judge Cave reversed the Commissioner’s decision and remanded the case for further proceedings and a new decision.
The plaintiff, Helgajeovankasuriel, and the Commissioner of Social Security; the case was returned to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings and a new decision.
What happened
In Suriel v. Commissioner of Social Security, the court entered judgment in favor of further review of the Commissioner’s decision in the plaintiff’s Social Security case.
The judgment says the court acted for the reasons stated in a February 1, 2024 stipulation and order. The judgment itself does not describe the underlying dispute or explain why the Commissioner’s decision was reversed.
The court reversed the Commissioner’s decision and remanded the action to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings and a new decision. Judge Sarah Cave is identified as the judge for this case.
The detailed version
- Suriel v. Commissioner of Social Security · No. 1:23-cv-08143
- Sarah Cave
- Feb. 1, 2024
Ruling
The court reversed the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision and remanded the action to the Commissioner under the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). A remand sends the case back to the agency for additional proceedings. The court ordered further administrative proceedings and a new decision.
Basis and limits of the judgment
The judgment states that the ruling was made for the reasons given in the court’s stipulation and order dated February 1, 2024. The provided judgment does not state what error led to the reversal or describe the parties’ underlying arguments. It cites Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993).
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.