Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 2, 2024

Torres v. Patricias Morris Park Corp.

Judge
Robert Lehrburger
Docket
1:23-cv-07820
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureFlsa
In one sentence

In Torres v. Patricias Morris Park Corp., Judge Rochon ordered the parties to discuss magistrate-judge consent after mediation failed.

Who this affects

Brayniel Torres and Patricias Morris Park Corp. and the other defendants in the case; the order also concerned any other people represented by Torres's claims.

What happened

In Torres v. Patricias Morris Park Corp., the court said mediation had been unsuccessful. The case was brought by Brayniel Torres individually and on behalf of others similarly situated against Patricias Morris Park Corp. and other defendants.

The court ordered the parties to discuss whether they would consent to having Magistrate Judge Lehrburger conduct all further proceedings. If they consented, they had two weeks to file the required form. If any party did not consent, the parties had to file a joint letter saying so without identifying the nonconsenting party and stating whether they wanted a settlement conference.

Judge Jennifer L. Rochon issued this case-management order on February 2, 2024. The order did not decide the underlying claims. It also reminded the parties that settlements of most claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act generally require court approval.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Torres v. Patricias Morris Park Corp. · No. 1:23-cv-07820
Judge
Robert Lehrburger
Date
Feb. 2, 2024

Background

Brayniel Torres sued Patricias Morris Park Corp. and other defendants individually and on behalf of others similarly situated. The court was informed that mediation had been unsuccessful.

Order

To conserve resources, promote judicial efficiency, and seek a faster resolution, the court ordered the parties to discuss consenting under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) to having Magistrate Judge Lehrburger conduct all further proceedings. If both parties consented, they were required to submit a fully completed consent-and-reference form within two weeks of the order. If the court approved the form, Magistrate Judge Lehrburger would conduct the remaining proceedings instead of Judge Rochon's court. An appeal from proceedings conducted after consent would go directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

If any party did not consent, the parties were required to file a joint letter within two weeks stating that they did not consent, without identifying the party or parties withholding consent. The court stated that withholding consent would not result in adverse consequences. The parties also had to state whether they wanted a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Lehrburger.

The court reminded the parties that settlements of claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act generally must be approved by the court, citing a Second Circuit decision. This order addressed case management and possible settlement procedures; it did not decide the merits of Torres's claims or the defendants' positions.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.