Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 5, 2024

Johnson-Cradle v. KPS Affiliates Inc.

Judge
Sarah Cave
Docket
1:22-cv-01052
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Johnson-Cradle v. KPS Affiliates, Judge Cave granted the parties’ request to submit materials supporting their proposed Fair Labor Standards Act settlement.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs, the defendants, and their attorneys are affected because they must submit a joint settlement-review filing and supporting documents by March 21, 2024.

What happened

In Johnson-Cradle v. KPS Affiliates Inc., PPB Inc., and Terry English, the parties told the court that they had reached a settlement in principle and asked for 45 days to put it in writing and seek approval.

Because the case includes claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, the court required the parties to explain why the proposed settlement is fair and reasonable. Their filing must discuss the claims, defenses, possible damages, the strengths and weaknesses of each side’s position, the negotiations, and other relevant issues.

Judge Sarah L. Cave granted the request. She ordered the parties to file a joint letter-motion and the settlement agreement by March 21, 2024, and directed the Clerk of Court to close the request docket entry. The order did not itself approve the settlement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Johnson-Cradle v. KPS Affiliates Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-01052
Judge
Sarah Cave
Date
Feb. 5, 2024

Background

The parties advised the court that they had reached a settlement in principle. They requested 45 days to reduce their understanding to a written agreement and seek court approval.

The case includes one or more claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal law governing certain wage and hour rights. The court cited the requirement that settlements of these claims be reviewed for fairness and reasonableness.

Required Settlement Materials

The parties must file a joint letter-motion addressing whether the settlement is fair and reasonable. The filing must discuss:

- the claims and defenses; - the defendants’ potential monetary exposure and the basis for calculating it; - the strengths and weaknesses of the plaintiffs’ case and the defendants’ defenses; - any reasons for a difference between the potential value of the plaintiffs’ claims and the settlement amount; - the litigation and negotiation process; and - other issues relevant to whether the settlement is reasonable, including whether a judgment would be collectible if the case went to trial.

The filing must also explain the attorney-fee arrangement, attach any retainer agreement, provide information about actual attorney fees incurred—including billing records and cost documentation—and include the settlement agreement itself. The filing was directed to the attention of the Honorable Arun Subramanian.

Ruling

Judge Cave granted the parties’ request. She ordered them to file the required letter-motion and supporting materials by March 21, 2024. She also directed the Clerk of Court to close the docket entry containing the request. The order required materials for settlement review but did not itself approve the settlement.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.