Zelvin v. CollectibleXchange, LLC
- Jesse Furman
- 1:23-cv-08763
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Zelvin v. CollectibleXchange, Judge Furman dismissed the case without prejudice under Rule 4(m) after Zelvin failed to serve the defendant.
Lynn Zelvin's case against CollectibleXchange, LLC was dismissed without prejudice and the case was closed.
What happened
In Zelvin v. CollectibleXchange, LLC, Lynn Zelvin filed a complaint on October 5, 2023, but did not file proof that CollectibleXchange had been served. The case was brought on behalf of Zelvin and others similarly situated.
After the deadline for serving the defendant passed, Magistrate Judge Cave ordered Zelvin to explain why the case should not be dismissed for failing to serve the defendant or pursue the case. Zelvin did not respond, and neither party filed objections to the recommendation that the case be dismissed.
Judge Jesse M. Furman reviewed the record and adopted the recommendation in its entirety. The court dismissed the case without prejudice under Rule 4(m) and directed the clerk to close the case.
The detailed version
- Zelvin v. CollectibleXchange, LLC · No. 1:23-cv-08763
- Jesse Furman
- Feb. 5, 2024
Background
Lynn Zelvin filed this putative class action against CollectibleXchange, LLC on October 5, 2023. The opinion states that Zelvin did not file proof of service, and that CollectibleXchange did not appear or answer.
Report and Recommendation
The case had been referred to Magistrate Judge Cave for general pretrial purposes. Judge Cave recommended dismissal without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), which concerns the required service of the complaint within the applicable period. Judge Cave also ordered Zelvin to show cause why the case should not be dismissed under Rule 4(m) and/or Rule 41(b) for failure to prosecute. Zelvin did not submit an affidavit, declaration, or other filing in response.
The Report and Recommendation gave the parties fourteen days to object and warned that failing to object would waive the right to object. No objections or extension request was filed. The district court therefore found that Zelvin had waived the right to object or obtain appellate review. Even so, the court independently reviewed the petition and the Report and Recommendation and found them well reasoned and supported by the facts and law.
Ruling
Judge Jesse M. Furman adopted the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. The court dismissed the case without prejudice under Rule 4(m) and directed the clerk to close the case. The opinion does not state whether any new action was filed or whether further proceedings occurred.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.