Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 12, 2024

Thales Avionics, Inc. v. L3 Technologies, Inc.

Judge
John Koeltl
Docket
1:24-cv-00112
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Thales Avionics v. L3 Technologies, Judge Tarnofsky granted Thales Avionics’s application to keep its February 9 letter and two exhibits under seal.

Who this affects

Thales Avionics, Inc., which obtained an order keeping its February 9, 2024 letter and Exhibits 2 and 3 under seal; the opinion also concerns documents involving L3 Technologies, Inc.

What happened

In Thales Avionics, Inc. v. L3 Technologies, Inc., Thales Avionics asked to file its February 9, 2024 letter and two attached exhibits under seal. The request concerned documents that might contain competitively sensitive information or had previously been limited to outside counsel’s review.

The court granted the application. The February 9 letter and Exhibits 2 and 3 were to remain under seal, and the clerk was directed to terminate the application.

Judge Robyn F. Tarnofsky signed the order on February 12, 2024.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Thales Avionics, Inc. v. L3 Technologies, Inc. · No. 1:24-cv-00112
Judge
John Koeltl
Date
Feb. 12, 2024

Background

Thales Avionics asked for permission to file under seal its February 9, 2024 letter and Exhibits 2 and 3 attached to that letter. The request stated that Exhibit 2 was a recent communication covered by a confidentiality agreement between Thales, S.A. and L3Harris Technologies, Inc. It also stated that the court had previously ordered Exhibit 3 to be treated as highly confidential and limited its disclosure to outside counsel’s eyes only.

Thales Avionics said it had no objection to filing the documents publicly but asked for sealing because Exhibit 2 might contain competitively sensitive information protected by the parties’ nondisclosure agreement, and because of the earlier restriction on Exhibit 3. The application cited decisions recognizing business secrecy and potential competitive harm as interests that can outweigh the presumption of public access to court records.

Ruling

The court granted Thales Avionics’s application. It ordered that Thales Avionics’s February 9, 2024 letter and Exhibits 2 and 3 remain under seal. The clerk was directed to terminate the application. Judge Robyn F. Tarnofsky signed the order.

Classification

This is a procedural order concerning the sealing of court documents. It does not decide the underlying dispute between the parties.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.