Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 12, 2024

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Virtu Financial Inc.

Judge
John Koeltl
Docket
1:23-cv-08072
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In SEC v. Virtu Financial, Judge Koeltl granted Virtu’s unopposed request to seal four exhibits containing confidential business information.

Who this affects

Virtu Financial Inc. and Virtu Americas LLC received permission to file four exhibits under seal; the Securities and Exchange Commission consented, and public access to those exhibits is limited.

What happened

In Securities and Exchange Commission v. Virtu Financial Inc., Virtu Financial Inc. and Virtu Americas LLC asked to file four exhibits under seal in support of their motion to dismiss the amended complaint. The exhibits contained information from Virtu’s internal policies and training manuals.

Virtu argued that the exhibits included confidential business, commercially sensitive, and information-security material. Virtu said public disclosure could reveal its business operations and training materials and place it at a competitive disadvantage. The Securities and Exchange Commission consented to the request.

The court granted the application. Judge John G. Koeltl therefore permitted Virtu to file the four exhibits under seal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Virtu Financial Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-08072
Judge
John Koeltl
Date
Feb. 12, 2024

Background

Virtu Financial Inc. and Virtu Americas LLC, referred to together in the application as Virtu, requested permission to file four exhibits under seal in support of their motion to dismiss the amended complaint. The exhibits were attached to a declaration supporting that motion.

The application stated that Virtu had previously sought to seal the same exhibits in connection with its first motion to dismiss and that the court had granted that earlier application. The exhibits concerned non-public, proprietary, and commercially sensitive information in Virtu’s internal policies and training manuals. They also contained information about Virtu’s information-security practices.

Parties’ Positions

Virtu argued that sealing was justified because disclosure could reveal confidential business information, including training materials and information about business operations, and could place Virtu at a competitive disadvantage. Virtu also argued that the request was narrowly tailored because the amended complaint and the motion to dismiss quoted only limited portions of the materials, while Virtu was not seeking to seal those references or quotations. The application stated that the Securities and Exchange Commission consented to the motion.

Ruling

The court’s ruling on the application states: “APPLICATION GRANTED.” Judge John G. Koeltl thus granted Virtu’s request to file the four exhibits under seal. The provided text does not include a separate written explanation by the court beyond that ruling.

Effect

The ruling permits the four specified exhibits to be filed under seal. It does not decide the merits of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s claims or Virtu’s motion to dismiss.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.