Crosley v. Banks
- Vyskocil
- 1:22-cv-07101
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Crosley v. Banks, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a settlement in principle, allowing restoration by March 13, 2024.
The plaintiffs—Crysal Crosley, Svetlana Nisanova, and the minors identified as Z.C., R.N., and Y.N.—and the defendants, David C. Banks in his official capacity and the New York City Department of Education.
What happened
In Crosley v. Banks, the defendants told the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
The court discontinued the action without costs to any party and allowed either side to seek restoration if the settlement could not be put in writing, provided the request was made by March 13, 2024.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ruled that if no restoration request was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Crosley v. Banks · No. 1:22-cv-07101
- Vyskocil
- Feb. 13, 2024
Background The defendants filed a letter informing the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not state the settlement’s terms.
Ruling The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party. The dismissal was initially without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing. Any application to restore the action had to be made by March 13, 2024.
The court further ordered that if no application to restore the action was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.