Morales v. Performance Master, Inc.
- Subramanian
- 1:21-cv-00097
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Morales v. Performance Master, Judge Subramanian ordered a one-week extension, until February 23, 2024, for defendants to file their reply.
The defendants J.D.M. Marmol & Granite and Marcos Zhiminaicela, whose deadline to submit a reply was extended to February 23, 2024.
What happened
Morales, et al. v. Performance Master, Inc. et al. concerns defendants’ request for additional time to submit a reply in the pending case.
Defense counsel requested a one-week extension because the attorney was leaving the firm, new counsel was being assigned, and plaintiffs’ exhibits had been provided with their opposition to summary judgment.
Judge Arun Subramanian ordered the extension on February 16, 2024, moving the reply deadline to February 23, 2024.
The detailed version
- Morales v. Performance Master, Inc. · No. 1:21-cv-00097
- Subramanian
- Feb. 16, 2024
Background
Counsel for defendants J.D.M. Marmol & Granite and Marcos Zhiminaicela asked for a one-week extension, until February 23, 2024, to submit the defendants’ reply. Counsel stated that the attorney was leaving the firm and new counsel was being assigned. Counsel also stated that plaintiffs had not previously provided the exhibits used in their opposition to summary judgment and that additional time was needed to review and discuss those materials with the defendants.
Ruling
The court ordered the requested extension. Judge Arun Subramanian signed the order on February 16, 2024.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.