Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 21, 2024

Shih v. Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Judge
Subramanian
Docket
1:24-cv-00988
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
SecuritiesClass ActionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Shih v. Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Judge Subramanian set deadlines for proposed class members to seek lead-plaintiff status.

Who this affects

The order affects Oliver Shih, members of the proposed class of Amylyx security purchasers, plaintiff’s counsel, the named plaintiffs, and the defendants.

What happened

In Shih v. Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Oliver Shih filed a proposed class action for people who purchased Amylyx securities between November 11, 2022, and November 8, 2023. The complaint alleges violations of federal securities laws.

The court said notice of the lawsuit was published on February 9, 2024. It set April 9, 2024, as the deadline for proposed class members to ask to serve as lead plaintiff, and April 16, 2024, as the deadline to oppose such a request.

Judge Arun Subramanian also ordered plaintiff’s counsel to report differences if an amended complaint or related case was filed before a lead plaintiff was appointed, and ordered the named plaintiffs to promptly serve the defendants with the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Shih v. Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · No. 1:24-cv-00988
Judge
Subramanian
Date
Feb. 21, 2024

Background

Oliver Shih filed a proposed securities class action on behalf of people who purchased Amylyx securities during the period from November 11, 2022, through November 8, 2023. The complaint alleges violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5.

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act requires notice to proposed class members after a securities class action is filed. The notice must describe the lawsuit, the claims, and the proposed class period. A proposed class member may then ask the court to appoint that person as lead plaintiff, meaning the person who will represent the proposed class in the litigation.

Court’s order

Plaintiff’s counsel notified the court that the required notice was published on February 9, 2024. The court therefore set April 9, 2024, as the deadline for members of the proposed class to move for appointment as lead plaintiff. The court set April 16, 2024, as the deadline to serve and file opposition to any lead-plaintiff motion.

The court also ordered that, if an amended complaint or related case was filed before appointment of a lead plaintiff, plaintiff’s counsel must submit a letter within one week identifying differences between the new and original allegations, including differences in the claims or proposed class periods, and explaining why the court should not require a new publication of notice and a new lead-plaintiff deadline. The named plaintiffs were ordered to promptly serve a copy of the order on each defendant.

Disposition and significance

Judge Arun Subramanian entered a case-management order governing notice, lead-plaintiff applications, possible republication of notice, and service on defendants. The order does not decide whether the securities allegations are legally or factually correct.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.