Stoytchev v. City of Yonkers
- Andrew Krause
- 7:22-cv-08877
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Stoytchev v. City of Yonkers, Judge Krause granted Stoytchev’s application for pro bono counsel after finding the required factors favored representation.
George Stoytchev, whose application for appointment of volunteer counsel was granted for presenting his claims at trial.
What happened
In Stoytchev v. City of Yonkers, George Stoytchev asked the court to appoint a volunteer lawyer to represent him. The court had previously required him to apply to proceed without paying court fees, and that application was granted.
The court found that Stoytchev was financially eligible, had litigated the case through nearly all discovery, and had claims substantial enough to proceed to trial. It also found that he had made significant unsuccessful efforts to find a lawyer and would benefit from legal assistance at trial.
Judge Andrew E. Krause granted Stoytchev’s application for appointment of pro bono counsel.
The detailed version
- Stoytchev v. City of Yonkers · No. 7:22-cv-08877
- Andrew Krause
- Feb. 22, 2024
Background
George Stoytchev applied for appointment of pro bono counsel, meaning a volunteer lawyer. On February 5, 2024, the court had denied his earlier application without prejudice, subject to his applying to proceed without paying court fees and having that application granted. Stoytchev filed that application on February 14, 2024, and the court granted it before deciding the counsel application.
Court’s analysis
The court considered whether Stoytchev was financially eligible and the factors identified by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Hodge v. Police Officers. Those factors included whether his claims appeared sufficiently substantial, his ability and efforts to obtain a lawyer, and his ability to handle the case without legal assistance.
The court found that Stoytchev had shown financial eligibility because his application to proceed without paying court fees had been granted. It also found that he had litigated the case through completion of almost all discovery, that his claims were sufficiently substantial to proceed to trial, that he had made significant unsuccessful efforts to obtain counsel, and that he would benefit from counsel’s assistance in presenting his claims at trial.
Disposition
Judge Andrew E. Krause granted Stoytchev’s application for appointment of pro bono counsel. The opinion does not identify the underlying claims or the lawyer who would be appointed.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.