Slijderink v. Kafene, Inc.
- Vyskocil
- 1:23-cv-07620
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
Slijderink v. Kafene, Inc.: Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after the parties reached a settlement in principle.
Sandor Slijderink, Pamela Amadril, and Kafene, Inc.; the action was discontinued based on the parties’ settlement in principle, subject to possible restoration by March 23, 2024.
What happened
In Slijderink v. Kafene, Inc., a plaintiff informed the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
The court discontinued the action without costs to either party. The case could be restored if the parties could not put their settlement in writing and someone applied to restore it by March 23, 2024.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that, if no restoration application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Slijderink v. Kafene, Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-07620
- Vyskocil
- Feb. 23, 2024
Background A plaintiff filed a letter informing the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
Court’s Order The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing. Any application to restore the action had to be made by March 23, 2024. The court further ordered that, if no such application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
Ruling Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered the order of dismissal on February 23, 2024. The opinion did not address the merits of the parties’ underlying claims.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.