Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled Feb. 29, 2024

Lee v. Grove Group Advisors LLC

Judge
Andrew Carter
Docket
1:20-cv-05937
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
6
ContractCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Lee v. Grove Group Advisors, Judge Carter enforced the settlement and ordered Defendants to pay Brian Lee $18,024.55.

Who this affects

Brian Lee was awarded $18,024.55. Grove Group Advisors LLC, Grove Group Management, Inc., and Kevin Shin were ordered to pay that amount jointly and severally.

What happened

In Lee v. Grove Group Advisors LLC, Brian Lee asked the court to enforce a settlement resolving his wage claims against Grove Group Advisors LLC, Grove Group Management, Inc., and Kevin Shin. The agreement required Defendants to pay $14,990 by January 11, 2021, but they had not paid it.

The court found that the parties had signed a binding, enforceable agreement. Defendants did not respond to Lee’s motion or claim that fraud, mistake, or pressure had affected the agreement.

Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. granted Lee’s motion and ordered the Defendants to pay him $14,990, plus $3,034.55 in interest, for a total of $18,024.55. The Defendants are responsible for the total jointly and individually.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Lee v. Grove Group Advisors LLC · No. 1:20-cv-05937
Judge
Andrew Carter
Date
Feb. 29, 2024

Background

Brian Lee sued Grove Group Advisors LLC, Grove Group Management, Inc., and Kevin Shin under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal wage law, and New York labor law. The parties reached a settlement, and the court approved it as fair and reasonable on December 28, 2021. The written agreement required Defendants to pay $14,990 in full by January 11, 2021. Lee stated that Defendants had not paid any of the settlement funds.

Lee moved to enforce the executed settlement agreement. The court gave Defendants multiple opportunities to respond, including an order asking why the motion should not be treated as unopposed. Defendants filed no response, and the court treated the motion as fully briefed and unopposed.

Legal standard

The court explained that it may summarily enforce a settlement reached in a case before it. A settlement is a contract governed by general contract principles. Under the standard discussed by the court, an enforceable agreement requires an offer, acceptance, consideration, mutual agreement, and an intent to be bound. A settlement may be set aside only for good cause, such as fraud, collusion, mistake, pressure that overcomes free choice, lack of capacity, unconscionability, violation of public policy, or ambiguity showing that the parties never reached agreement.

Court’s decision

The court found that the parties had a written agreement signed by Lee and by Shin in his capacity as chief executive officer of the Grove entities. The court had already approved the agreement. Defendants did not dispute that they signed it and did not claim that fraud, mistake, or pressure caused them to enter it. Considering the circumstances, the court found the agreement enforceable and granted Lee’s motion to enforce it.

The court also calculated interest under New York law at 9% per year. It calculated $3,034.55 in interest on the $14,990 principal from January 11, 2021, when payment was due, through April 12, 2023, when Lee filed the enforcement motion. The court ordered Lee to recover $14,990 plus $3,034.55 in interest, for a total of $18,024.55, from Grove Group Advisors LLC, Grove Group Management, Inc., and Kevin Shin, jointly and severally.

The authoritative version

Read the full 6-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.