Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 4, 2024

Walker v. Monica Rich Kosann

Judge
John Cronan
Docket
1:23-cv-04409
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Intellectual PropertyCivil ProcedureMotion to DismissPro Se
In one sentence

In Walker v. Monica Rich Kosann, Judge Cronan granted all dismissal motions and allowed Walker to file a second amended patent-infringement complaint.

Who this affects

Andrew Walker, Jr., and the defendants—Provenance Gems, LLC, eBay, Inc., Fisher-Price, Inc., Monica Rich Kosann, Woodrow Jewelers, and Amazon Advertising LLC—were affected. The dismissal motions were granted, but Walker was allowed to file a second amended complaint.

What happened

Andrew Walker, Jr., who is representing himself, sued Monica Rich Kosann and others for allegedly infringing a patent. The defendants asked the court to dismiss the case.

A magistrate judge recommended granting all the dismissal motions while allowing Walker to amend his complaint again. No party objected within the required time, so the parties waived their right to object or seek appellate review of the recommendation.

Judge John P. Cronan reviewed the recommendation and adopted it completely. The court granted the dismissal motions filed by Provenance Gems, LLC, eBay, Inc., Fisher-Price, Inc., Monica Rich Kosann, Woodrow Jewelers, and Amazon Advertising LLC, and allowed Walker to file a second amended complaint by April 3, 2024.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Walker v. Monica Rich Kosann · No. 1:23-cv-04409
Judge
John Cronan
Date
Mar. 4, 2024

Background

Andrew Walker, Jr., appearing without a lawyer, brought an action alleging patent infringement. The amended complaint was filed at Docket Number 5.

Provenance Gems, LLC moved to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2), arguing that the court lacked personal jurisdiction over it. The other defendants—eBay, Inc., Fisher-Price, Inc., Monica Rich Kosann, Woodrow Jewelers, and Amazon Advertising LLC—moved to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6), arguing that the amended complaint failed to state a legally sufficient claim.

Report and Recommendation

Magistrate Judge Jennifer E. Willis issued a Report and Recommendation on February 16, 2024. She recommended granting all defendants’ motions to dismiss and allowing Walker to file another amended complaint.

The recommendation told the parties that they had fourteen days to object and that objections had to be filed with the Clerk of Court and through the electronic filing system. No objections were filed, and the time to object expired. The court stated that the parties therefore waived the right to object to the recommendation or obtain appellate review of it.

Ruling

Despite the waiver, the court conducted its own review of the recommendation and found it well reasoned and supported. Judge John P. Cronan adopted the recommendation in its entirety.

The court granted the motions to dismiss filed by Provenance Gems, LLC, eBay, Inc., Fisher-Price, Inc., Monica Rich Kosann, Woodrow Jewelers, and Amazon Advertising LLC. The court also granted Walker leave to file a second amended complaint within thirty days of the order, by April 3, 2024. The order stated that if Walker did not file the complaint or obtain an extension by that date, the court would direct the Clerk to close the case without further notice. The Clerk was directed to close the listed pending motions.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.