Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 4, 2024

Borjas v. New York City Department of Education

Judge
Ona Wang
Docket
1:23-cv-10829
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Borjas v. New York City Department of Education, Judge Torres ordered U.S. Marshals to serve defendants after allowing Stacy A. Borjas to proceed without prepaying fees.

Who this affects

Stacy A. Borjas, the New York City Department of Education, Tiawanna Perez, Victor Garcia, the Clerk of Court, and the U.S. Marshals Service.

What happened

In Borjas v. New York City Department of Education, Stacy A. Borjas, representing herself, sued under federal, New York State, and New York City laws. She alleges that her former employer discriminated and retaliated against her because of her sex and disability.

The court had previously allowed Borjas to proceed without prepaying filing fees. Because of that authorization, the court ordered the Clerk to prepare summonses and service forms for the New York City Department of Education, Tiawanna Perez, and Victor Garcia, and send the necessary papers to the U.S. Marshals Service.

Judge Torres ordered service through the Marshals Service and stated that Borjas should request more time if service is not completed within 90 days after the summonses are issued. The order did not decide whether her discrimination or retaliation claims were valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Borjas v. New York City Department of Education · No. 1:23-cv-10829
Judge
Ona Wang
Date
Mar. 4, 2024

Background

Stacy A. Borjas is proceeding without a lawyer and brings claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Family and Medical Leave Act, the New York State Human Rights Law, and the New York City Human Rights Law. She alleges that her former employer discriminated and retaliated against her based on sex and disability.

The court notes that, in an order dated January 12, 2024, it allowed Borjas to proceed without prepaying court fees. A person granted that status may rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants.

Order

The court directed the Clerk of Court to issue summonses for the New York City Department of Education, Tiawanna Perez, and Victor Garcia; complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for each defendant; and deliver the required documents to the Marshals Service. The listed service addresses were provided for each defendant.

The court stated that if the complaint is not served within 90 days after the summonses are issued, Borjas should request an extension of time. It also required her to notify the court in writing if her address changes and warned that the court may dismiss the action if she fails to do so. The Clerk was also directed to mail Borjas an information package.

Result

This was an order arranging service of the complaint, not a decision on the merits of Borjas’s discrimination or retaliation claims. Judge Analisa Torres ordered the Clerk and Marshals Service to take the specified steps to serve the defendants.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.