Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 6, 2024

Norman v. Three In One Equities, LLC

Judge
Rochon
Docket
1:22-cv-03173
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
ADA / DisabilityCivil ProcedureFee Petition
In one sentence

Norman v. Three In One Equities: Judge Rochon entered default judgment awarding $30,189.66 and permanent injunctive relief to Norman.

Who this affects

Kimmarie Norman received default judgment, permanent injunctive relief, $1,500 in damages, and $28,689.66 in attorney’s fees and costs; Three In One Equities, LLC was ordered to pay the judgment.

What happened

In Norman v. Three In One Equities, LLC, Kimmarie Norman alleged that Three In One and a deli’s public accommodation violated the Americans with Disabilities Act and state and local laws. Norman later voluntarily dismissed the deli from the case without prejudice.

Norman sought default judgment against Three In One after the company did not oppose her motion. A magistrate judge recommended granting the motion and awarding permanent injunctive relief, damages, attorney’s fees, and costs. Three In One did not object to that recommendation by the deadline.

Judge Rochon adopted the recommendation after finding no clear error, while clarifying the calculation of the award. The court entered judgment for Norman for $30,189.66: $1,500 in damages, $28,092 in attorney’s fees, and $597.66 in costs.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Norman v. Three In One Equities, LLC · No. 1:22-cv-03173
Judge
Rochon
Date
Mar. 6, 2024

Background

Kimmarie Norman sued Three In One Equities, LLC, and 3 Star Deli Grocery Inc., alleging that their place of public accommodation violated the Americans with Disabilities Act and several provisions of state and local law. Norman later stipulated to the voluntary dismissal of 3 Star Deli without prejudice.

Default-judgment proceedings

Norman moved for default judgment against Three In One on October 2, 2023. After receiving an extension to serve the default-judgment papers, Norman filed proof that she mailed the papers to Three In One. Three In One filed no opposition.

Magistrate Judge Cott issued a Report and Recommendation advising that the motion be granted and that Norman receive permanent injunctive relief, damages, attorney’s fees, and costs. Norman mailed the Report to Three In One on February 17, 2024. The court calculated that objections were due 17 days later, on March 5, 2024. No objections were filed.

Court’s ruling

The court reviewed the Report for clear error because Three In One had received notice of the consequences of failing to object. Judge Rochon found the Report’s reasoning sound and not clearly erroneous, except for a numerical inconsistency.

The Report recommended $1,000 in compensatory damages, $500 in statutory damages, $28,092 in attorney’s fees, and $597.66 in costs. Those amounts total $30,189.66. The court clarified that the Report’s reference to $28,689.66 described attorney’s fees and costs, while the damages totaled $1,500.

The court adopted the Report in its entirety as clarified, directed the Clerk to terminate the pending motions, and entered judgment in Norman’s favor for $30,189.66. The court also stated that Three In One’s failure to object precluded appellate review of the decision.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.