Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled Mar. 7, 2024

Martinez v. Kijakazi

Judge
John Koeltl
Docket
1:23-cv-05464
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Social SecurityCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Martinez v. Kijakazi, Judge Koeltl reversed the Social Security decision and remanded the case for further proceedings and a new decision.

Who this affects

The plaintiff and the Commissioner of Social Security are affected. The Commissioner’s decision was reversed, and the case was sent back for further administrative proceedings, a new decision, and an opportunity for the plaintiff to receive a new hearing.

What happened

In Martinez v. Kijakazi, the court reversed the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision. The judgment states that the action was remanded for further administrative proceedings and a new decision.

The remand was issued under the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The plaintiff will be offered the opportunity for a new hearing.

Judge John Koeltl is identified in the supplied case information. The judgment was dated March 7, 2024.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Martinez v. Kijakazi · No. 1:23-cv-05464
Judge
John Koeltl
Date
Mar. 7, 2024

Background

The opinion is a judgment in a Social Security case. The judgment refers to the reasons stated in the court’s Stipulation and Order dated March 7, 2024, but that Stipulation and Order is not included in the provided text.

Ruling

The court ordered that the Commissioner’s decision be reversed and that the action be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security under the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The remand is for further administrative proceedings and a new decision. The judgment also states that the plaintiff will be offered the opportunity for a new hearing.

What the Opinion Does Not Explain

The provided judgment does not state the specific error in the Commissioner’s decision, the plaintiff’s benefits history, or what issues must be addressed during the new proceedings. The caption identifies the defendant as Martin O’Malley, Commissioner of Social Security, while the supplied case name identifies the case as Martinez v. Kijakazi.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.