Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 8, 2024

Pearson v. Wellpath Health Services

Judge
Kenneth Karas
Docket
7:24-cv-01714
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Pearson v. Wellpath Health Services, Judge Swain ordered a prisoner to pay fees or submit authorization within 30 days.

Who this affects

Robert Pearson, who must either pay the required fees or submit a prisoner authorization within 30 days for the case to proceed; the defendants had not yet been served because no summons was issued.

What happened

Pearson v. Wellpath Health Services concerns Robert Pearson’s pro se civil action against Wellpath Health Services and other defendants. Pearson, who was incarcerated at Orange County Jail, submitted an application to proceed without paying fees upfront but did not submit the required prisoner authorization.

The court ordered Pearson, within 30 days, either to pay $405 in fees or submit the completed authorization. The authorization would allow installment payments of the $350 filing fee from his prison account and require certified account statements. The court directed that no summons issue at that time.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain stated that the case would be processed if Pearson complied and would be dismissed if he did not. The court also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Pearson v. Wellpath Health Services · No. 7:24-cv-01714
Judge
Kenneth Karas
Date
Mar. 8, 2024

Background

Robert Pearson, who was incarcerated at Orange County Jail, filed this civil action without a lawyer. He submitted an application to proceed without prepaying court fees, commonly called an application to proceed in forma pauperis, or IFP. He did not submit the separate prisoner authorization required for an incarcerated person seeking IFP status.

Court’s order

The court explained that a prisoner must either pay $405 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee—or submit a signed IFP application and prisoner authorization. The administrative fee does not apply to a person who is granted IFP status. The prisoner authorization permits the court to collect the $350 filing fee in installments from the prisoner’s account and requires the facility to provide certified account statements for the previous six months.

The court ordered Pearson to pay the $405 or submit the completed prisoner authorization within 30 days of the order. The authorization had to identify docket number 24-CV-1714 (LTS). No summons would issue at that time.

Disposition and effect

The court stated that the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures if Pearson complied. If he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed. The court also certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal. This order addressed filing requirements and did not decide the underlying claims against the defendants.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.