Bullock v. Garnea, LLC
- Vyskocil
- 1:23-cv-10666
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
Bullock v. Garnea, LLC: Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a settlement in principle, allowing restoration by April 13, 2024.
Justin Bullock, the represented class, and Garnea, LLC; the action was discontinued subject to possible restoration by April 13, 2024, after which the dismissal would be with prejudice.
What happened
In Bullock v. Garnea, LLC, Plaintiff Justin Bullock told the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
The court discontinued the action without costs to either party. The case could be restored if the parties could not put their settlement in writing and an application to restore was filed by April 13, 2024.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that if no restoration application was filed by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Bullock v. Garnea, LLC · No. 1:23-cv-10666
- Vyskocil
- Mar. 13, 2024
Background
Justin Bullock, individually and as the representative of a class of similarly situated persons, sued Garnea, LLC. Bullock filed a letter informing the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
Court’s Order
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party. The order allowed the action to be restored to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing, provided that an application to restore the action was made by April 13, 2024.
The court further ordered that if no application to restore the action was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice. The opinion does not state the settlement’s terms or resolve the underlying claims.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.