Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 14, 2024

Urena v. The City of New York

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-01880
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
5
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Urena v. City of New York, Judge Swain ordered payment or IFP paperwork before the case could proceed.

Who this affects

Amaury Urena, who must either pay the required fees or submit the specified IFP application and prisoner authorization within 30 days for the action to proceed.

What happened

In Urena v. The City of New York, Amaury Urena, who is incarcerated and representing himself, filed a civil action without paying the required fees or submitting the required forms.

The court gave Urena 30 days to either pay $405 in filing and administrative fees or submit an application to proceed without prepaying fees and a prisoner authorization. No summons will be issued yet, and the action will be dismissed if he does not comply within the allowed time.

Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees, finding that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Urena v. The City of New York · No. 1:24-cv-01880
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Mar. 14, 2024

Background

Amaury Urena filed this civil action against The City of New York and other defendants. The opinion states that Urena is currently incarcerated at Rikers Island—Rose M. Singer Enhanced Supervised Housing and is proceeding without a lawyer.

Urena submitted his complaint without paying the filing fees and without a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), meaning without prepaying court fees. He also did not submit the required prisoner authorization.

Order

Judge Swain ordered Urena, within 30 days of the order, to do one of two things:

1. Pay $405 in fees, consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee; or 2. Submit a signed IFP application and prisoner authorization.

If the court grants a prisoner’s IFP application, the Prison Litigation Reform Act still requires collection of the $350 filing fee in installments from the prisoner’s account. The prisoner authorization permits the correctional facility to deduct those payments and requires certified account statements for the preceding six months. The $55 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted IFP status under the cited statute.

The documents submitted in response must identify docket number 24-CV-1880 (LTS). The court stated that no summons would be issued at that time. If Urena complies, the case will be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures. If he does not comply within the permitted period, the action will be dismissed.

Appeal and classification

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal. The order addresses filing requirements and does not decide the underlying claims against the defendants.

The authoritative version

Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.