Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 14, 2024

Rose v. Sapienza

Judge
Kenneth Karas
Docket
7:24-cv-01887
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
5
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Rose v. Sapienza, Judge Swain ordered Alexis Rose to pay $405 or submit required forms within 30 days to continue the case.

Who this affects

Alexis Rose, an incarcerated plaintiff proceeding without a lawyer, must either pay the required fees or submit the specified forms within 30 days for the case to be processed; otherwise, the action will be dismissed.

What happened

Rose v. Sapienza concerns Alexis Rose’s civil action against Christopher Sapienza and other defendants. Rose, who is incarcerated and represents himself, filed the complaint without paying the required fees or submitting a completed application to proceed without prepaying them and a prisoner authorization.

The court gave Rose 30 days to either pay $405 or submit the required application and authorization. If Rose does not comply, the action will be dismissed; if he does comply, the Clerk’s Office will process the case. The court also said that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain issued the order directing payment or submission of the forms. The order addressed filing requirements and did not decide the claims’ merits.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Rose v. Sapienza · No. 7:24-cv-01887
Judge
Kenneth Karas
Date
Mar. 14, 2024

Background

Alexis Rose, who is incarcerated at Green Haven Correctional Facility, filed this civil action without a lawyer against Christopher Sapienza and other defendants. Rose submitted the complaint without paying the filing fees and without submitting a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs, commonly called an IFP application, or a prisoner authorization.

Court’s Order

The court explained that a prisoner filing a civil action must either pay $405 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee—or submit a signed IFP application and prisoner authorization. If the court grants a prisoner’s IFP application, the $350 filing fee must still be paid in installments from the prisoner’s account. The prisoner authorization permits the facility to deduct those installments and requires certified account statements for the previous six months to be sent to the court.

The court ordered Rose, within 30 days of the order, to either pay the $405 or submit the IFP application and prisoner authorization labeled with docket number 24-CV-1887 (LTS). No answer from the defendants was required at that time. If Rose complies, the Clerk’s Office will process the case under its procedures. If Rose does not comply within the allowed time, the action will be dismissed.

The court certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal. The order also cautioned that a prisoner dismissal for frivolousness, maliciousness, or failure to state a claim can count as a “strike” under federal law.

Nature of the Ruling

Judge Laura Taylor Swain issued a procedural order addressing payment of filing fees and required forms. The order did not decide the underlying claims or whether Rose is entitled to relief.

The authoritative version

Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.