Goldrich v. Masco Corporation
- Kenneth Karas
- 7:22-cv-03769
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Goldrich v. Watkins Wellness, Judge Karas granted defendants’ motion to dismiss and dismissed Goldrich’s claims with prejudice after two amendments.
Steven Goldrich, Watkins Wellness, and Wellness Marketing Corporation, doing business as Endless Pools.
What happened
In Goldrich v. Watkins Wellness, Steven Goldrich sued Watkins Wellness and Wellness Marketing Corporation, doing business as Endless Pools. The judgment states that Goldrich had already amended his complaint twice, including once after being told about its problems.
The court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss. It denied another opportunity to amend, dismissed Goldrich’s claims with prejudice, and closed the case.
Judge Karas is identified in the case information as the judge. The judgment was entered on March 20, 2024, by the court clerk for the reasons stated in a separate opinion and order.
The detailed version
- Goldrich v. Masco Corporation · No. 7:22-cv-03769
- Kenneth Karas
- Mar. 20, 2024
Background
Steven Goldrich brought claims against Watkins Wellness and Wellness Marketing Corporation, doing business as Endless Pools. The judgment states that Goldrich had already amended his complaint twice, and that he had amended it once after being notified of deficiencies in the complaint. The judgment also refers to an earlier decision as the first adjudication of his claims on the merits.
Ruling
The court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss. It refused to allow another amendment, explaining that granting leave to amend would give Goldrich a “third bite at the apple.” The court dismissed Goldrich’s claims with prejudice and closed the case.
What the judgment does not say
The provided judgment does not describe the specific deficiencies in the complaint or explain the underlying legal theories in detail. It states that those reasons appear in the court’s Opinion and Order dated March 20, 2024.
Disposition
Judge Kenneth Karas is identified in the case information as the presiding judge. The judgment was dated March 20, 2024, and entered by the clerk of court.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.