Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 22, 2024

Keitel v. D'Agostino, Sr.

Judge
Jesse Furman
Docket
1:21-cv-08537
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
17
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Keitel v. D’Agostino, Judge Furman granted one final extension for Keitel to respond to a contempt order and provide medical records.

Who this affects

Frederick J. Keitel, III must respond to the contempt order and submit supporting medical records by March 28, 2024. The defendants must serve the order and may respond by April 4, 2024.

What happened

In Keitel v. D’Agostino, the court had ordered Frederick J. Keitel, III to explain why he should not be held in contempt for failing to follow court orders. Keitel asked for more time, citing health problems and medical treatment.

The court granted one final extension, retroactively extending the deadline to March 28, 2024. Keitel must respond to the contempt order and submit medical records supporting his medical conditions and care. The court warned that failure to comply would almost certainly lead to contempt proceedings, which could include daily or weekly fines or custody by the U.S. Marshals Service until compliance.

Judge Jesse M. Furman also allowed the defendants to respond by April 4 and ordered them to serve the order on Keitel by certified mail and email, with proof of service due March 25. The order did not decide whether Keitel was in contempt.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Keitel v. D'Agostino, Sr. · No. 1:21-cv-08537
Judge
Jesse Furman
Date
Mar. 22, 2024

Background

On December 20, 2023, the court ordered Frederick J. Keitel, III to show in writing why he should not be held in contempt for failing to obey court orders. The court gave him until January 25, 2024. Keitel sought an extension, stating that ongoing health issues and medical care made additional time necessary.

On January 19, 2024, the court directed Keitel to submit medical records for private judicial review and reserved a decision on his extension request. The January 31 deadline for submitting those records passed without a submission. Keitel later filed or sent two more extension requests, including one filed March 19, 2024.

Ruling

Judge Furman granted Keitel one final extension, retroactively setting March 28, 2024 as the deadline to do both of the following:

1. Respond to the order to show cause concerning why he should not be held in contempt; and 2. Submit medical records supporting his claimed medical conditions and care.

The court warned that failing to meet the new deadline would almost certainly result in a contempt finding. The court stated that possible consequences could include fines for each day or week of continued noncompliance and/or confinement in the custody of the U.S. Marshals Service until Keitel complies.

The court granted the defendants permission to respond, or to report Keitel’s noncompliance, by April 4, 2024. It ordered the defendants to serve Keitel with the order by certified mail and email and to file proof of service by March 25, 2024. The clerk was also directed to mail a copy to Frederick J. Keitel, II at the address listed in the order.

What the Order Did Not Decide

This order extended deadlines and set service requirements. It did not determine whether Keitel was in contempt or resolve the underlying claims in the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 17-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.