Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 25, 2024

Doeman Music Group Media And Photography LLC v. DistroKid, LLC

Judge
Garnett
Docket
1:23-cv-04776
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Doeman Music Group v. DistroKid, Judge Garnett granted Doeman until March 26 to seek default judgment against Ms. George.

Who this affects

Doeman and Ms. George: Doeman received until March 26 to file a default-judgment motion, while Ms. George faced dismissal from the case if Doeman missed that deadline.

What happened

Doeman Music Group Media and Photography LLC asked for more time to file a request for a judgment against Raquella “Rocky Snyda” George, who had not appeared in the case. The case is Doeman Music Group Media And Photography LLC v. DistroKid, LLC.

Doeman’s lawyer requested an extension through March 26, 2024, under a federal procedural rule. The lawyer said Doeman had obtained the clerk’s entry and certificate of default and intended to continue pursuing the case against Ms. George.

Judge Margaret M. Garnett granted the extension but said no additional extension requests would be granted. Judge Garnett ordered that, if Doeman did not file the motion by March 26, the court would dismiss Ms. George from the case for failure to prosecute without notifying any party, and directed the clerk to terminate docket entry 44.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Doeman Music Group Media And Photography LLC v. DistroKid, LLC · No. 1:23-cv-04776
Judge
Garnett
Date
Mar. 25, 2024

Background

The order concerns Doeman Music Group Media and Photography LLC’s effort to obtain a default judgment against Defendant Raquella “Rocky Snyda” George. The opinion text states that Ms. George had failed to appear. Doeman’s attorney said the court had previously directed Doeman to pursue a default judgment and that Doeman had obtained the clerk’s entry of default and certificate of default.

Request for an Extension

Doeman requested an extension under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1) to file its motion for default judgment by March 26, 2024. The attorney explained that he had overlooked an earlier court order because of an email issue, then needed time to prepare the motion. He also stated that Doeman had begun the two-step process for seeking default judgment: obtaining an entry of default first and then requesting a judgment based on that default.

Ruling

The court granted the requested extension. It stated that no additional requests for an extension would be granted. If Doeman did not file the motion for default judgment against Ms. George by March 26, the court would dismiss Ms. George from the action for failure to prosecute without notice to any party. The court also directed the clerk to terminate docket entry 44. Judge Margaret M. Garnett signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.