Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 28, 2024

McCargo v. Jamison

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-02367
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
HabeasCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In McCargo v. Jamison, Chief Judge Swain ordered the petitioner to pay $5 or submit a request to proceed without prepaying fees within 30 days.

Who this affects

Kareem McCargo, the self-represented petitioner, must either pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed without prepaying fees within 30 days to avoid dismissal of the action.

What happened

In McCargo v. Jamison, Kareem McCargo filed a petition for a court order in a habeas case without paying the filing fee or submitting an application to proceed without prepaying fees.

The court ordered McCargo, within 30 days, either to pay the $5 filing fee or submit a signed application requesting permission to proceed without prepaying fees. The court also said that no summons would be issued at that time and that the action would be dismissed if he did not comply.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
McCargo v. Jamison · No. 1:24-cv-02367
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Mar. 28, 2024

Background

Kareem McCargo, representing himself, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The opinion does not decide the substance of that petition. McCargo submitted it without the required $5 filing fee and without an application to proceed without prepaying fees.

Order

The court ordered McCargo to do one of two things within 30 days of the order: pay the $5 filing fee, or complete and submit the attached signed application to proceed without prepaying fees. If the court grants that application, McCargo may proceed without paying the fees in advance. The application was to include docket number 24-CV-2367 (LTS).

The court directed that no summons be issued at that time. If McCargo complies, the case will be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures. If he does not comply within the allowed time, the action will be dismissed.

Appeal-related ruling

The court certified that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. This order addressed filing requirements and did not resolve the habeas petition’s underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.