Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 1, 2024

Abdullah v. Sergeant Seyed N. Huda

Judge
James Oetken
Docket
1:24-cv-00139
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
5
Civil RightsSection 1983Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Abdullah v. Huda, Judge Oetken dismissed the 28th Precinct, added New York City, and ordered service on the defendants.

Who this affects

Abdul H. Abdullah's case continues against the City of New York, Sergeant Seyed N. Huda, and Officer Carlos M. Gracia; the 28th Precinct was dismissed as a defendant.

What happened

Abdul H. Abdullah, representing himself, sued under a federal civil-rights law, alleging that the 28th Precinct, Sergeant Seyed N. Huda, and Officer Carlos M. Gracia falsely imprisoned him. He had permission to proceed without paying court fees in advance.

The court ruled that the 28th Precinct cannot be sued and dismissed the claims against it. Because Abdullah clearly intended to sue New York City, the court replaced the precinct with the City, without limiting the City's possible defenses.

J. Paul Oetken directed the clerk to issue summonses and have the U.S. Marshals Service serve New York City, Sergeant Huda, and Officer Gracia. The court also denied fee-free status for any appeal, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Abdullah v. Sergeant Seyed N. Huda · No. 1:24-cv-00139
Judge
James Oetken
Date
Apr. 1, 2024

Background

Abdul H. Abdullah, who is representing himself, brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal law allowing claims for violations of constitutional rights by state or local officials. He alleges that the defendants falsely imprisoned him. Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain had granted Abdullah permission to proceed without prepaying court fees.

Rulings on the Defendants

The court dismissed the claims against the 28th Precinct because the precinct lacks the capacity to be sued. The court also stated that treating the claims as claims against the New York City Police Department would not change the result because the Police Department likewise cannot be sued under the New York City Charter.

Because Abdullah clearly intended to assert claims against the City of New York, the court ordered the clerk to replace the 28th Precinct with the City as a defendant under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21. The order states that this amendment is without prejudice to any defenses the City may assert.

Service of Process

Because Abdullah was allowed to proceed without prepaying fees, the court directed the clerk to prepare summonses and U.S. Marshals Service forms for the City of New York, Sergeant Seyed N. Huda, and Officer Carlos M. Gracia. The Marshals Service is to receive the necessary paperwork and serve those defendants. The court extended the service period to 90 days after the summonses are issued. Abdullah must notify the court in writing if his address changes.

Appeal Fee Status

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal.

Disposition

The order dismisses the claims against the 28th Precinct, adds the City of New York as a defendant, and directs service on the City, Sergeant Huda, and Officer Gracia.

The authoritative version

Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.